will live up to its commitments is thus an important part of extended deterrence, and arguably more difficult than deterring the adversary. may not make good on its promises since its territory is not at stake. Allies understandably fear that if push came to shove, the U.S. That is a very bold claim to make, especially when the threatening country-in this case North Korea-can threaten U.S. extends its nuclear umbrella it is making a promise to use its nuclear weapons to protect territory that is not its own. extended deterrence commitments is the credibility problem. extended deterrence is primarily geared toward preventing a North Korean attack, nuclear or conventional, against South Korea.Ī perennial challenge to U.S. nuclear weapons is supposed to dissuade allies from acquiring their own nuclear weapons. Extended deterrence has an important nonproliferation component as well, as the protection offered by U.S. using its nuclear arsenal to prevent attacks against its allies. The phrase “extended deterrence” describes the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |